Share what you’ve learned about the mixed-methods strategy, including the advantages and disadvantages of this research design.

Using a Combination of Methods The research strategy enables the researcher to gain a more complete understanding of a social problem by combining statistical trends from gathered quantitative data with participant perspectives from qualitative data. According to Catallo, Ciliska, and MacMillan (2013), “mixed methods allow for a deeper and richer understanding [â€] of phenomena or to provide a richer explanation of results” (Pg. 2). This method includes design models such as Convergent design, Explanatory Sequential design, Exploratory design, and Advanced design.

A mixed methods strategy has the advantage of compensating for deficiencies in numerical leaden quantitative data or potentially biased qualitative data. The use of a mixed method has the advantage of presenting a well-rounded interpretation of the research question.

The use of “rigorous” substantial quantitative and qualitative analysis is one of the mixed-flaws. method’s (Dr. J. Creswell; 2013). The process of collecting data from both methods becomes time-consuming, and most researchers are unfamiliar with mixed-method compound procedures, according to The Center for Innovation in Research and Teaching (CIRT).

Explain why you would prefer to use the mixed-methods methodology if you ever conduct human services research. If so, why or why not?

Although this writer is unfamiliar with Mixed Method methodology, he can see the benefits of using it in human services. The method would add validity to qualitative research and humanity to quantitative research, allowing it to reach a wider audience.

What quantitative and qualitative techniques were used in the study?

Catallo, Ciliska, and MacMillan (2013) employed an explanatory sequential mixed methods strategy that included a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) and a grounded theory approach. To maintain rigor, the researchers made adjustments to the grounded theory approach.

Why do you believe the researcher chose a mixed-methods study over a strictly quantitative or qualitative design? Would you have chosen the mixed-methods design if you were the researcher? If so, why or why not?

Because of the sensitive nature of the study, it is unlikely to be popular in some circles. Choosing a mixed—method strategy would transform mundane statistical data into real people, giving the reader something to relate to, thereby improving understanding and broadening awareness of the problem.