In the text, read the case Campbell Soup Co. v. Wentz. Respond to the following questions:

1. What were the terms of Campbell and the Wentzes’ contract?
2. Did the Wentzes live up to their end of the bargain?
3. Did the court believe that specific performance was an adequate legal remedy in this case?
4. Why did the court refuse to assist Campbell in enforcing its legal agreement?
5. How could Campbell modify its contract in the future to avoid the unconsionability issue?

Be at least 200 words long.